Home >

Adidas'S "Three Bars" Contend For &Nbsp; Defeat In China'S Battlefield.

2011/12/13 13:44:00 29

한국어 日本語 Français English 中文

Adidas Apparel Association Market Clothing

Adidas

It has been a long time since the world launched the "three bars struggle for hegemony".

clothing

Whether the three bars are general graphics or exclusive Adidas is still controversial.

In the past few years, many Chinese enterprises have also been prosecuted and lost all.

But this year, ADI has encountered "Waterloo" in China, and this time it wins. ADI is the Jinjiang textile and Apparel Association.

According to the new evidence, the Beijing intermediate people's court and the Beijing high court have overturned the ruling of the Shang jury, and found that the design of "three bars" and other styles is the clothing adornment commonly used by Chinese clothing enterprises.

market

A common pattern of sportswear.

It has to start in 2002.

In September 13th of that year, Adidas applied to the State Administration for Industry and Commerce Trademark Office to apply for the registration of "three bar line" trademarks, designated for use in twenty-fifth categories of clothing.

If the trademark is registered successfully, it means that Chinese clothing enterprises can not use "three bar lines" on the side of clothing.

The Jinjiang textile and Garment Association has submitted an objection to the State Trademark Bureau and the business jury.

However, the result is: the trademark is approved for registration.

Jinjiang textile and clothing association

Last year, he filed a lawsuit against the Beijing intermediate people's court and presented new evidence: as early as the 80s of last century, Tianjin knitted sports clothing factory used "three bars" and "two bars".

The Chinese clothing association also offered help. It has proved that the design of a bar, two bars, three bars and five bars on the side of the sleeves and trousers is a fashion decoration commonly used by Chinese clothing enterprises, and it is a common pattern of sportswear in the Chinese market.

Accordingly, the court overturned the ruling of the business jury.

However, the business jury and Adidas refused to accept this decision, and the Jinjiang textile and Garment Association was informed of the Beijing high court.

Results in February of this year, the Beijing High Court upheld the original verdict.

At this point, a dispute between China's footwear industry and ADI's "three bars" ended in China's victory.

This means that in the future, all enterprises in China can use the "three bars" in accordance with the law and do not have to worry about becoming defendants.