New Interpretation Of Alternative Dress Functions

Especially developed, famous brand products are dazzling, and the mass media often broadcast attractive fashion shows.

The most profitable ones are probably rich businessmen who are rich in trade. They have a strong economic foundation and can enjoy the fashionable and expensive clothes that can easily reach thousands of yuan.

Perhaps they did not think that their predecessors did not choose this way today.

Freedom.

The status of ancient merchants was at the end of the "four people". Although they had more money than farm workers, they were restricted in their dress.

Liu Bang, who was born in the rascals and became an emperor, did not forget to return to his hometown. He felt uncomfortable when he saw that the businessman was dressed in luxury. He ordered that the "Jia people should not be clothed in beauty, beauty, and joy." in today's words, they should not wear clothes of fine silk, wool and light gauze.

It is not just merchants who have been deprived of their freedom to wear.

In the long feudal era, power was human.

There is a strict rule that clothing is a symbol of human identity and a hierarchical symbol of human beings.

The regulations are strict and hierarchical, and no one is allowed to overstep them.

Yellow and dragon robes are exclusively used by emperors, and overstepping is a form of treason. Zhu Zi has become a high official in order to be a valuable official, but he can only use his purple clothes.

"No one can't take his clothes, so Shun Li Ye" (after Han Shu) is precisely because the clothing is the external representation of the rank, the clothing has become the human's reference, "Qingyi" is the handmaiden, "the cloth clothing" is the populace, "Zhu purple" is the high official.

It is a product created by people in the long term evolution of life to serve the people. It is used to protect the sun from the cold, cover up the body and cover the eyes, and express itself in the language of the academic community. It has three functions: practicality, ethics and beautification.

In the era of imperial rule, dress became a class label that people could not refuse. It became a functional symbol of the loss of equal dignity.

This alternative function of clothing is undoubtedly the alienation of its basic functions and the blasphemy of its basic functions.

The beautification function dominates the choice of dress, or gorgeous, or simple, or time keeping, or conservative. Different costumes appeal to different aesthetic tastes.